Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 800 SO2D 81 - Thomas v. Janzen

Thomas v. Janzen’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2002
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sutton v. United States · Richards v. Jefferson County · Meza v. General Battery Corp. · Hudgins v. Brown · 359 So. 2d 154 - Welch v. Crown Zellerbach Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “of the parties in three limited circumstances: 1) the nonparty is the successor in interest of a party; 2) the nonparty controlled the prior litigation; and 3) the nonparty's interests were adequately represented by a party to the action who may be considered the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.