Moore v. Fry’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 2018
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. Pope · Ewart v. Peniston · Speck v. Union Electric Co. · State Ex Rel. Peabody Coal Co. v. Powell · State Ex Rel. Baldwin v. Dandurand
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ll appeals shall be taken within the time prescribed by the rules of civil procedure relating to appeals.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]t is reasonable to conclude that in referring to the civil code in the statutes cited, it was the intent of the legislature that the conflicts be resolved by applying the civil code as superseded by the Rules. This court holds that § 472.141 and § 506.010 should be so construed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State“[t]he civil code of Missouri and the rules of civil procedure shall govern all other actions or proceedings which may be heard by a judge of the probate division pursuant to assignment or otherwise, except as otherwise provided by law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.