Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 800 SW2D 739 - Williams v. State

Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably Toney v. Gammon (1996), State v. Burgess (1990)

27 state decisions

160199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Toney · Adams v. State · State v. Webb · State v. Talbert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Multiple sentences of imprisonment shall run concurrently unless the court specifies that they shall run consecutively; except that, in the case of multiple sentences of imprisonment imposed for the felony of rape, forcible rape, sodomy, forcible sodomy or an attempt to commit any of the aforesaid and for other offenses committed during or at the same time as that rape, forcible rape, sodomy, forcible sodomy or an attempt to commit any of the aforesaid, the sentences of imprisonment imposed for the other offenses may run concurrently, but the sentence of imprisonment imposed for the felony of rape, forcible rape, sodomy, forcible sodomy or an attempt to commit any of the aforesaid shall run consecutively to the other sentences.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he statute establishes two kinds of offenses for sentencing purposes-the listed offenses and 'other offenses.' It states clearly what the court must do if the defendant is convicted of an offense in each class.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]e cannot say that the judge might not have pronounced a less severe sentence if he thought he had discretion to do so,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.