Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

801 A.2d 951

Atraqchi v. GUMC Billing Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 2002-06-12

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2016

1 district · 4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-06-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2On consideration of the motion of appel-lee, Gerald I. Shugoll, for clarification of the court’s opinion filed January 10, 2002, and appellants’ opposition thereto, it is

¶3ORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that the court’s opinion filed Januai’y 10, 2002, is amended as follows:

¶4On page 561, footnote 3 of 778 A.2d 559, should read:

The claim against Dr. Shugoll was “dismissed in its entirety” on June 7, 2000, without explanation. No appeal was taken from this order of dismissal. The complaint against GUMC Unified Billing Services, Dr. Colson and Sheil-ene Scott was dismissed on June 7, 2000, for “failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.” On February 15, 2001, the complaint “as to all claims asserted against Defendants” was dismissed “for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”
/801/a2d/951 · .json · Public domain