Reese v. Frey’s Empirical Analysis
801 F.2d 348 · 1986
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2000
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Hill v. Lockhart · Giglio v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the court file in which the warrant was found was readily available to [the defendant] and his attorney, and it can hardly be said that the prosecutor suppressed the warrant or failed to disclose its existence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“reasonable probability that [her] direct appeal would have been successful had the issue been submitted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.