Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

801 F.2d 394

Docket No. 85-6731.

Gray v. Bordenkircher

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted April 16, 1986. Decided Sept. 23, 1986.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1986-09-23

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on James Ivory Lawrence v. Wayne B. Winebrenner, Warden

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1986-09-23

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Eddie Woodrow Gray, appellant pro se.

Mary Rich Maloy, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

S.D.W.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Gray v. Bordenkircher, C/A No. 82-5126 (S.D.W. Va., Oct. 29, 1982; Oct. 30, 1985).

¶2

DISMISSED.

/801/f2d/394 · .json · Public domain