Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 801 F.2d 462 - Bois v. Marsh

Bois v. Marsh’s Empirical Analysis

801 F.2d 462 · 1986

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 2021
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 25 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2021 · most notably Taylor v. Federal Deposit Insurance (1997), Kreis v. Secretary of the Air Force (1989)

34 federal appellate · 25 district · 1 state decisions

23019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1961 · 28 U.S.C. § 2674 · 28 U.S.C. § 2680 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Warth v. Seldin · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · United States v. Sherwood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Civilian courts must, at the very least, hesitate long before entertaining a suit which asks the court to tamper with the established relationship between enlisted military personnel and their superior officers; that relationship is at the heart of the necessarily unique structure of the military establishment.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the exhaustion doctrine is subject to exceptions, even in the context of suits alleging wrongs suffered incident to military service” but declining to consider such exceptions because”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “reform of military procedures to which she [was] no longer subject.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.