Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

801 F.2d 871

Docket No. 83-1136.

Booker v. Jabe

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Sept. 20, 1984.

Decided Sept. 26, 1986.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1986-09-26

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 1992 · most notably United States v. Forbes (1987), Stanley v. State (1988)

23 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg · Allen v. Hardy

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1986-09-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Chari Grove argued, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner-appellant.

¶2*872Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen. of Mich., Eric J. Eggan, Edgar L. Church, Jr. argued, Asst. Atty. Gen., Corrections Div., Lansing, Mich., for respondent-appellee.

¶3Before MERRITT and JONES, Circuit Judges; and BELL, District Judge.*

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6This appeal is before us on remand from the Supreme Court “for further consideration in light of Allen v. Hardy, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 2878, 92 L.Ed.2d 199 (1986) and Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986).” Michigan v. Booker, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 3289, 92 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986). We have reviewed those decisions and have determined that they do not affect our disposition of Booker v. Jabe, 775 F.2d 762 (6th Cir.1985).

¶7We therefore reinstate our previous opinion and judgment.

/801/f2d/871 · .json · Public domain