Darryl v. Coler Bd Cd’s Empirical Analysis
801 F.2d 893 · 1986
Citation profile
47 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 119 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Myers v. Morris (1987), Tenenbaum v. Williams (1999)
47 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Bell v. Wolfish · Edelman v. Jordan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 119 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) He must evaluate the traditional factors enumerated in the case law; wheth er there is an adequate remedy at law, a danger of irreparable harm, some likelihood of success on the merits. See Roland Machinery Co. v. Dresser Industries, Inc., 749 F.2d 380, 386-88 (7th Cir.1984). (2) He must make factual determinations on the basis of a fair interpretation of the evidence before the court. (3) He must draw legal conclusions in accord with a principled application of the law.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[f]ourteenth amendment due process analysis obviously differs in some respects from fourth amendment analysis.... both interests can be treated together.... [because] [w]hether substantive due process rights are at stake, or procedural due process rights are at stake, a court must essentially weigh the privacy interest of the family member against the interests of the government”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]lso at stake ... are the closely related legitimate expectations of the parents or other caretakers, protected by the fourteenth amendment, that their familial relationship will not be subject to unwarranted state intrusion”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.