Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 801 F.3d 921 - Smith v. Conocophillips Pipe Line Co.

Smith v. Conocophillips Pipe Line Co.’s Empirical Analysis

801 F.3d 921 · 2015

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
August 2021
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes · Frank v. Environmental Sanitation Management, Inc. · Adkins v. Thomas Solvent Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reverse a certification where there has been an abuse of discretion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.