Barringer v. Griffes’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1341 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady · Quill Corporation v. North Dakota Heitkamp · Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota · Henneford v. Silas Mason Co. · Wyoming v. Oklahoma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in other states are faced with an incentive to purchase a vehicle in Vermont. In that way, they aver, the tax skews business towards Vermont automobile dealers. 36 The district court admitted”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Barringer v. Griffes“[t]he tax can create an incentive to defer buying a car until after completing a move to Vermont,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Barringer v. Griffes“does not necessarily create an incentive to buy the car in Vermont.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Barringer v. Griffes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.