Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2005
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Richardson v. State · Marcum v. State · Beeching v. Levee · Vestal v. State · Vestal v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[STATE:] Your honor, I’m asking for straight executed time in the Department of Corrections. THE COURT: How much? [STATE:] ... I think six years is not inappropriate .... I’d also like to point out that I think that the Theft does merge in ivith the Burglary .... THE COURT: You agree that the Theft does merge? [STATE:] Yes. THE COURT: Okay. In that case then we should only show a conviction on Count One [Burglary]. Show Count Two [Theft] merging into One [Burglary].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Wright v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.