Erickson v. Rubey’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kansas v. Crane · Cass County State's Attorney v. R.A.S. · Molbert v. J.K. · Cass County State's Attorney v. E.W.F. · State v. Loughead
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an individual who is shown to have engaged in sexually predatory conduct and who has a congenital or acquired condition that is manifested by a sexual disorder, a personality disorder, or other mental disorder or dysfunction that makes that individual likely to engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct which constitute a danger to the physical or mental health or safety of others.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Erickson v. Rubey · Suhr v. J.M.““We review civil commitments of sexually dangerous individuals under a modified clearly erroneous standard in which we will affirm a district court’s order ‘unless it is induced by an erroneous view of the law or we are firmly convinced the order is not supported by clear and convincing evidence.’ ””
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Erickson v. Rubey · Suhr v. J.M.““Conclusory, general findings do not comply with N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a), and a finding of fact that merely states a party has failed in [or has sustained] its burden of proof is inadequate under the rule. The court must specifically state the facts upon which its ultimate conclusion is based.... The purpose of the rule is to provide the appellate court with an understanding of the factual issues and the basis of the district court’s decision. Because this Court defers to a district court’s choice between two permissible views of the evidence and the district court decides issues of credibility, detailed findings are particularly important when there is conflicting or disputed evidence.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Erickson v. Rubey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.