State v. Nissalke’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2024
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · McMann v. Richardson · California v. Trombetta · Arizona v. Youngblood · Illinois v. Fisher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must first make a threshold showing that the evidence [he] seeks to admit has an 'inherent tendency to connect the alternative perpetrator to the charged crime.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Guzman“went through eight gallons and it was still not enough.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nissalke v. State“did not cause all the injuries to the subject's body,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nissalke v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.