Pierre v. Bank’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schwarz v. ADMINISTRATORS TUL. EDUC. FUND · 731 So. 2d 983 - Fairbanks v. Tulane University · 722 So. 2d 348 - Smith v. General Motors Corp. · 775 So. 2d 1144 - Newton & Associates, Inc. v. Sheridan · McCant v. Nissan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[7] In holding that the combination of the letter and check in Pierre constituted a settlement, this Court stated that: The language of the letter sent by [the defendants] clearly explains their intent to settle with Ms. Pierre. The letter preceded and made clear the purpose for which the check was tendered, i.e. to pay the contractors and suppliers as well as make restitution to Ms. Pierre. On the face of the check were written the words”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.