Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

801 So. 2d 290

Docket No. 1D00-4803.

Wallis v. Sikes

Linda WALLIS, Petitioner, v. Thomas SIKES, Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 12, 2001.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-12-12

Relies on 617 So. 2d 305 - DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERVICES v. Privette · Worley v. State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Davis

Decided 2001-12-12

¶1Janet A. Carver, Fernandina Beach, for Petitioner.

¶2Gary Baker, Callahan, for Respondent.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Linda Wallis seeks review by certiorari of an order requiring her child to submit to blood testing in a paternity action by Thomas Sikes. We conclude that the order is a departure from the essential requirements of the law and that the error cannot be corrected on appeal from the final judgment. The child was conceived and born during the marriage of Linda Wallis and Robert Wallis, and is therefore presumed to be legitimate. Before ordering a blood test to identify the biological father, the trial court must appoint a guardian ad litem for the child and determine whether the blood test would be in the child's best interest. See Dep't of Health & Rehab. Servs. v. Privette,617 So.2d 305 (Fla.1993); Worley v. Dep't of Rev.,735 So.2d 573 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Mr. Sikes argues that Mr. Wallis did not object to the blood test, but that argument overlooks the trial court's obligation to protect the interests of the child.

¶5Accordingly, we quash the order requiring the child to submit to blood testing and *291 remand the case to the trial court for further consideration.

¶6BOOTH, WEBSTER and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

/801/so2d/290 · .json · Public domain