State ex rel. T.A.’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 397 So. 2d 469 - State, in Interest of Sapia · 761 So. 2d 801 - Joseph v. Jefferson Parish Fire Department · 706 So. 2d 561 - State, in Interest of Jh · State v. Lathers · 733 So. 2d 84 - State ex rel. R.F.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The legislature thereby made clear that a court may compel the Department of Corrections to expend its resources for the care and treatment of a juvenile offender only when it commits the offender to the custody of the Department. Even then, the court may not designate which resources the Department must employ for the juvenile's benefit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State ex rel. G.P.“Although the juvenile court has the authority to place respondent in a non-state facility for care and treatment as a condition of probation under La.Ch.C. art. 897(B)(2)(d), the court had no authority without the assent of the Department to place respondent in an Impact Program funded by the Department and at the Department's expense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State ex rel. G.P.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.