Ingram v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Commonwealth v. Burge (1997), Perdue v. Commonwealth (1996)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Brown v. Ohio · Missouri v. Hunter · Grady v. Corbin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) when a single course of conduct of a defendant may establish the commission of more than one offense, he may be prosecuted for each such offense. He may not, however, be convicted of more than one offense when: (a) One offense is included in the other....” KRS 505.020. An offense is included when it is”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miller v. Com.“to prohibit multiple punishments for the same offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miller v. Com.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.