Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 801 SW2D 394 - Langham v. Mann

Langham v. Mann’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1993
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blatt v. Haile · Danforth v. Danforth · Shaffer v. Cochenour · Winkler v. Winkler · Jones v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In any [will contest] action the petitioner shall proceed diligently to secure and complete service of process as provided by law on all parties defendant. If service of process is not secured and completed upon all parties defendant within ninety days after the petition is filed, the petition, on motion of any defendant duly served upon the petitioner or his attorney of record, in the absence of a showing by the petitioner of good cause for failure to secure and complete service, shall be dismissed at the cost of the petitioner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.