Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 801 SW2D 607 - Straughter v. State

Straughter v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2017

17 state decisions

140199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Batson v. Kentucky · Tompkins v. Texas · Hagemann v. American Savings & Loan Ass'n · Marathon Oil Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]ppellant must show a causal connection between [the failure to take appellant before a magistrate] and his confession.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.