State v. Crockett’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
July 2002
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · State v. Moiser · State v. Hall · State v. Hoeber · State v. Rousan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court erred in overruling appellant’s motion to dismiss or in the alternative to stay the proceedings because the jury selection process failed to comply with the declared policy of §§ 494.400 to 494.505, RSMo 1989, in violation of appellant’s right to equal protection and due process of law as guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution in that appellant’s jury failed to represent a fair cross-section of the community in Cape Girardeau County.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Perkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.