United States v. Bradford S. Taylor, United States of America v. Vincent Carmen Pinto’s Empirical Analysis
802 F.2d 1108 · 1986
Citation profile
80 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 117 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 603 So. 2d 739 - State v. Lobato (1992), United States v. Penagos (1987)
80 federal appellate · 3 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2311 (Anti Car Theft Act of 1992) · 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 3500 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 659
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Wong Sun v. United States · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 117 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“statements made by an unarrested co-conspirator who is still operating in furtherance of the ongoing conspiracy may be introduced against the arrested conspirator.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[o]nce the government establishes that a conspiracy exists, evidence of only a slight connection to the conspiracy is necessary to convict a defendant of knowing participation in it.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is to ascertain the intent of Congress and to give effect to legislative will.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.