Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

802 F.2d 111

Docket No. 83-6039.

Carrier v. Murray

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Oct. 3, 1986.

Relies on Murray v. Carrier · Alizadeh v. Safeway Stores, Inc. · Carrier v. Hutto

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1986-10-03

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently July 2009 · most notably Fair Employment Council of Greater Washington, Inc. v. BMC Marketing Corp. (1994), Benjamin v. Aroostook Medical Center, Inc. (1995)

3 federal appellate · 10 district ·

120198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. (No. 84-1554).

Before WINTER, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE, ERVIN, CHAPMAN, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The Supreme Court has reversed the en banc judgment of this court, as set forth in Carrier v. Hutto, 754 F.2d 520 (4th Cir.1985), and remanded the cause to this court for further proceedings in conformity with its opinion therein. Murray v. Carrier, --- U.S. ---, 106 S.Ct. 2639, 91 L.Ed.2d 397 (1986). Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court for examination of the victim's statements in order to determine whether there may be merit to Carrier's habeas corpus petition.

¶2

REMANDED.

/802/f2d/111 · .json · Public domain