Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 802 F.2d 1127 - Cominotto v. United States

Cominotto v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

802 F.2d 1127 · 1986

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
July 2014
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2014 · most notably Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain (2004), Katusha Nurse v. United States of America Unknown Employees of the Department of the Treasury US Customs Service (2000)

14 federal appellate · 3 district ·

1601986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2680

Relies on United States v. Mitchell · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · United States v. McConney · Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “typically involve allegations of negligent guidance in an office within the United States of employees who cause damage while in a foreign country, or of activities which take place within a foreign country.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “in the place where the negligent act or omission occurs, not necessarily at the site of the injury or the place where the negligence has its”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'headquarters claim' exists where negligent acts in the United States proximately cause harm in a foreign country.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.