Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 802 F.2d 256 - Fenolio v. Smith

Fenolio v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

802 F.2d 256 · 1986

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
December 2009
most recently cited

19 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2009

19 federal appellate ·

150198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Die & Toolmakers Lodge 113, International Ass'n of Machinists v. National Labor Relations Board · 8 Ill. 2d 164 - Allendorf v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. · 26 Ill. 2d 403 - The People v. Stahl · 116 Ill. App. 3d 563 - Tracy v. Village of Lombard · Avance v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Improper statements during closing arguments warrant reversal only if they 'influenced the jury in such a way that substantial prejudice resulted to' the opposing party.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.