United States v. Meyer’s Empirical Analysis
802 F.2d 348 · 1986
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 2010
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 18 U.S.C. § 2253 · 18 U.S.C. § 2255 · 18 U.S.C. § 545 · 19 U.S.C. § 1305 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Solem v. Helm · Missouri v. Hunter · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Albernaz v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There is no indication that the stipulation was involuntary or that the defendant was unaware of its contents”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Clendenin“to reconcile appellant's sentence with the sentences that other courts have imposed on other defendants,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.