Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 802 F.2d 532 - Jaskiewicz v. Mossinghoff

Jaskiewicz v. Mossinghoff’s Empirical Analysis

802 F.2d 532 · 1986

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently September 2012

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

1101986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 28 U.S.C. § 1338 · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 28 U.S.C. § 1631 · 35 U.S.C. § 111 · 35 U.S.C. § 31 · 35 U.S.C. § 32 · 35 U.S.C. § 33

Relies on Willner v. Committee on Character and Fitness, Appellate Div. of Supreme Court of NY, First Judicial Dept. · Panduit Corp. v. All States Plastic Manufacturing Co. · Hanford v. Davies · Beghin-Say International Inc. v. Ole-Bendt Rasmussen · Charlton v. Federal Trade Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We can hardly imagine the Federal Circuit seeking 'to achieve uniformity in patent matters' without exclusive jurisdiction over appeals relating to who may practice before the Patent and Trademark Office.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Athridge v. Quigg
  2. “a civil action arising under an Act of Congress relating to patents.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Wyden v. Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks
  3. “regulations established under section 31 of this title”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Edmund M. Jaskiewicz v. Gerald J. Mossinghoff, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.