Davis v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis
802 F.3d 168 · 2015
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1151 (§ 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Aguilar-Solis v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · VELARDE · 21 I. & N. Dec. 722 - S-M-J · Javier Bernal-Vallejo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Choeum v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An immigration petitioner's right to due process entails, at its core, the right to notice of the nature of the charges and a meaningful opportunity to be heard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.