Gonzalez v. Hasty’s Empirical Analysis
802 F.3d 212 · 2015
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan · Hutto v. Finney · Patterson v. County of Oneida · Alfano v. Costello
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“composed of a series of separate acts that collectively constitute one unlawful ... practice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“to discrete unlawful acts, even where those discrete acts are part of a serial violation,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.