Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 802 F.3d 469 - Reyes v. Netdeposit, LLC

Reyes v. Netdeposit, LLC’s Empirical Analysis

802 F.3d 469 · 2015

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · Basic Inc. v. Levinson · United States Parole Commission v. Geraghty · Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts · Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable; (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class; (3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class; and (4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “although such subtle but irrelevant variations in the manner of defrauding members of the public would not insulate unscrupulous marketers from liability in individual suits, it would' — for all practical purposes'— insulate them from class actions. An interpretation of Rule 23 that places class actions beyond the reach of consumers who have been victimized by fraudulent schemers who are wise enough to adopt schemes with subtle (but meaningless) variations would' invite the kind of consumer fraud that ... is alleg[ed] here.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “if absolute conformity of conduct and harm were required for class certification, unscrupulous businesses could victimize consumers with impunity merely by tweaking the language in a telemarketing script or directing some (or all) of the telemarketers not to use a script at all but to simply orally convey a general theme designed to get access to personal information such as account numbers.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.