Singh v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis
802 F.3d 972 · 2015
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Farah v. Ashcroft · Xiu Xia Lin v. Mukasey · Shrestha v. Holder · Navaratwam Kamalthas v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“our task 'is to determine whether there is substantial evidence to support the BIA's finding, not to substitute an analysis of which side in the factual dispute we find more persuasive.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mairena v. Barr“an adverse credibility determination cannot be based on complete speculation and conjecture,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Arrey v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.