FDIC v. Caliendo’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Grace v. Sterling, Grace & Co. · Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Webb · Capos v. Mid-America National Bank of Chicago · Reed v. Central National Bank of Alva
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The reason behind the third exception is that the price determining function of the market should guarantee a fair price with collateral regularly sold on that market so that the debtor need not worry that the secured party will get a fair price for the collateral. (Citation omitted). Thus, if the collateral is stock traded on the New York Stock Exchange or grain on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, where supply and demand accurately reflect the price, the secured party need not give reasonable notification to the debtor before sale.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a question should properly be raised as to whether the pledgee has exercised reasonable care under the circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Layne“the receipt of a reasonable request by the pledgor/borrower to either sell or have the stock redeemed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Layne
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.