802 F. Supp. 2d 39 - Epos Technologies Ltd v. Pegasus Technologies Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
September 2014
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 112
Relies on Phillips v. AWH Corp. · Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. M-I LLC
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A system for digitizing operative strokes of a drawing implement comprising a body, a back end, and a front end opposite the back end comprising an operative tip, the system comprising: at least one ultrasound receiver assembly; a housing comprising a substantially cylindrical opening terminating at a first end, and an inner housing surface having a central bore, the housing receiving a portion of the drawing implement, the operative tip extending through the central bore; a retainer attachable to a second end of the opening to retain the drawing implement within the housing, the re tainer having a spring element for biasing the drawing implement towards the inner housing surface; and an ultrasound transmitter mounted relative to the housing proximal the central bore.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.