Bennett v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State ex rel. Goldsmith v. Marion County Superior Court, Criminal Division No. 1 · Pannarale v. State · Kendrick v. State · State Ex Rel. Goldsmith v. Marion County Superior Court · Sinn v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is within the trial court's discretion to accept or reject a plea agreement and the sentencing provisions therein; however, if the court accepts such an agreement, it is strictly bound by its sentencing provision and is precluded from imposing any sentence other than required by the plea agreement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Rivera v. State · Cox v. State“Of course, even if the product of an agreement, a sentence imposed contrary to statutory authority would render a plea agreement void and unenforceable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Stites v. State · Fields v. State“[A] plea agreement is contractual in nature, binding the defendant, the state and the trial court. The prosecutor and the defendant are the contracting parties, and the trial courts role with respect to their agreement is described by statute: If the court accepts a plea agreement, it shall be bound by its terms.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lee v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.