Phillips v. Schwendiman’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2018
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Roe v. Wade · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Carafas v. J · Board of License Commissioners of Town of Tiverton v. H Pastore · Burkett v. Schwendiman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A general averment ... that appellants may suffer economic inconvenience or expenses resulting from the suspensions of their driver's licenses does not demonstrate a collateral consequence that is imposed by law because of the administrative action.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Legg · Towner v. Ridgway“An appeal is moot when the present controversy between the parties is ended and 'the requested judicial relief cannot affect the rights of the litigants.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.