Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 802 P.2d 111 - State v. Erickson

State v. Erickson’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
9
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently September 2014 · most notably Kitsap County v. Allstate Ins. Co. (1998), Stiley v. Block (1996)

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 38 state decisions

340199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Salt Lake City v. Carner · State v. Bryan · American Fork City v. Crosgrove · State v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “sufficiently vague to look beyond the confines of the document to other evidence of intent. Based on the foregoing, we conclude that the court below was correct in looking beyond the literal language of the deed so as to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.