Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 802 SO2D 1051 - Dock v. State

Dock v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Evans v. State · Harper v. Showers · 678 So. 2d 663 - Sanders v. State · 626 So. 2d 121 - Nelson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Sections 47-5-138(3)(a) and (b) are fully applicable against pro se litigants who seek post-conviction relief.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “an order of a state or federal court that dismisses a lawsuit brought by an inmate while the inmate was in the custody of the Department of Corrections as frivolous, malicious[,] or for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A trial court's conclusion that a motion is frivolous is reviewed for abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.