Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 802 So. 2d 107 - Murray v. State

802 So. 2d 107 - Murray v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McClain v. State · 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 440 So. 2d 297 - Groseclose v. State · 691 So. 2d 948 - Herring v. State · 373 So. 2d 1042 - Gandy v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In determining whether or not a jury verdict is against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, this Court must accept as true the evidence which supports the verdict and will reverse only when it is convinced that the circuit court has abused its discretion in failing to grant a new trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the jury [as] the judge of the weight and credibility of testimony [was] free to accept or reject all or some of the testimony given by each witness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.