Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 802 So. 2d 1113 - Pullen v. State

802 So. 2d 1113 - Pullen v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

27 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · Mathews v. Eldridge · Morrissey v. Brewer · Santosky v. Kramer · Addington v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an individual who faces involuntary commitment to a mental health facility has a liberty interest at stake”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he deprivation of liberty which results from confinement under a state's involuntary commitment law has been termed a `massive curtailment of liberty.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[v]ery rarely is the person's mental illness contested.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.