802 So. 2d 1213 - Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kansas v. Hendricks · Mark Seling Superintendent Special Commitment Center v. Andre Brigham Young · Lippett v. State · 767 So. 2d 637 - Westerheide v. State · 684 So. 2d 814 - Alachua Reg. Juv. Detention v. To
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The question of statutory interpretation is subject to de novo review. Our purpose in construing a statute is to give effect to the Legislature's intent.... [T]he statute's plain and ordinary meaning must control, unless this leads to an unreasonable result or a result clearly contrary to legislative intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Act sets forth a procedure for commitment and includes provisions for the annual examination of committed persons and judicial review of their status.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the alleged violations of the Act's notice, examination, and review procedures are not the cause of [the committed person's] detention”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.