Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

802 So. 2d 1222

Mir v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 16, 2002

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-01-16

Relies on Heggs v. State

Decided 2002-01-16

¶1Confession of Error

PER CURIAM.

¶2Vladimir Mir appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The State concedes that defendant-appellant Mir is within the window period for Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), and is entitled to be resentenced. Accordingly we reverse the order now under review and remand for resentencing.

¶3We conclude that defendant’s claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel are time-barred. We affirm the trial court’s order insofar as it denied relief on the claim of ineffective assistance.

¶4Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.

/802/so2d/1222 · .json · Public domain