Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

802 So. 2d 1223

Frye v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 16, 2002

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-01-16

Decided 2002-01-16

PER CURIAM.

¶1As the State properly concedes, the appellant’s motion to clarify illegal sentence should be granted. On remand, the trial court is directed to clarify the following: that the re-sentencing order is nunc pro tunc to the original sentencing date of May 18, 1996; that the sentence should include the sentence for count 7, the severed unlawful possession of a firearm conviction; that all sentences are to run concurrent; and that the appellant did not receive a habitual violent offender sentence as to count 3, the burglary conviction that was overturned on appeal.

¶2Remanded with directions.

/802/so2d/1223 · .json · Public domain