Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 802 SO2D 1254 - State v. Deal

State v. Deal’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

46 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Chapman v. State of California · Gregg v. Georgia · Sullivan v. Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he elements of `sudden passion' and `heat of blood' are mitigatory factors in the nature of a defense, and when such factors are established by a preponderance of the evidence, a verdict for murder is inappropriate.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “... an expert witness shall not express an opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the accused.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A. Manslaughter is: (1) A homicide which would be murder under either Article 30 (first degree murder) or Article 30.1 (second degree murder), but the offense is committed by sudden passion or heat of blood immediately caused by provocation sufficient to deprive an average person of his self-control and cool reflection. Provocation shall not reduce a homicide to manslaughter if the jury finds that the offender's blood had actually cooled, or that an average person's blood would have cooled, at the time the offense was committed[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.