802 So. 2d 281 - Seagrave v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
55 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 591 So. 2d 930 - Karchesky v. State · Friedrich v. State · 750 So. 2d 1 - Hayes v. State · In re Rules of Criminal Procedure · 604 So. 2d 471 - Green v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“One of the most fundamental tenets of statutory construction requires that we give statutory language its plain and ordinary meaning, unless words are defined in the statute or by the clear intent of the legislature.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“it is a basic principle of statutory construction that courts `are not at liberty to add words to statutes that were not placed there by the Legislature.'”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. LG v. State · Holmes v. State“When necessary, the plain and ordinary meaning of words can be ascertained by reference to a dictionary.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.