Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 802 So. 2d 281 - Seagrave v. State

802 So. 2d 281 - Seagrave v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

55 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 591 So. 2d 930 - Karchesky v. State · Friedrich v. State · 750 So. 2d 1 - Hayes v. State · In re Rules of Criminal Procedure · 604 So. 2d 471 - Green v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “One of the most fundamental tenets of statutory construction requires that we give statutory language its plain and ordinary meaning, unless words are defined in the statute or by the clear intent of the legislature.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “it is a basic principle of statutory construction that courts `are not at liberty to add words to statutes that were not placed there by the Legislature.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “When necessary, the plain and ordinary meaning of words can be ascertained by reference to a dictionary.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.