Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

802 So. 2d 421

Docket No. 3D01-1181.

Reddick v. State

Edward REDDICK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 5, 2001.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-12-05

Cited by 4 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2005

3 state decisions

Relies on Wilson v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-12-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Edward Reddick, in proper person.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.

¶3Before JORGENSON, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.

¶4*422 PER CURIAM.

¶5The defendant, Edward Reddick, filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The record refutes the claims raised by the defendant, and therefore, we affirm the denial of the motion for post-conviction relief. However, as the State properly concedes, the portion of the written sentencing order that provides that the two twenty-five year sentences are to run consecutively does not conform to the trial court's oral pronouncements that the sentences are to run concurrently. Therefore, we vacate that portion of the sentencing order, and remand for entry of written sentencing order that conforms to the trial court's oral pronouncements. Alvarez v. State,698 So.2d 1377 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

¶6Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded.

/802/so2d/421 · .json · Public domain