Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 802 SO2D 442 - Portner v. State

Portner v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State · State v. Schopp · 694 So. 2d 678 - Reese v. State · 640 So. 2d 106 - Brown v. State · 572 So. 2d 969 - Hernandez v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]nly if the appellate court can say, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defense was not procedurally prejudiced by the discovery violation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In determining whether a Richardson violation is harmless, the appellate court must consider whether there is a reasonable possibility that the discovery violation procedurally prejudiced the defense. As used in this context, the defense is procedurally prejudiced if there is a reasonable possibility that the defendant’s trial preparation or strategy would have been materially different had the violation not occurred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) whether the violation was inadvertent or willful, (2) whether it was trivial or substantial, and (3) whether noncompliance... has prejudiced the opposing party's ability to properly prepare for trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.