Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 802 SO2D 478 - Clark v. Clark

Clark v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rosenhouse v. Ever · 654 So. 2d 1250 - MacLeod v. Hoff · 519 So. 2d 1056 - Hirsch v. Hirsch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We distinguish Rosenhouse based on the fact that in that case the wife’s attorney applied for fees after she died and the proceedings had abated.... We believe, however, that as long as a request for attorneys’ fees is filed prior to the death of the party, it makes no difference whether or not the trial court specifically reserved jurisdiction as to that issue. Because Mr. Clark filed his motions prior to his death, the lower court continued to have jurisdiction over the issue of attorneys’ fees.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.