802 So. 2d 533 - State v. Duncan’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “there is not a per se rule that a certain number or percentage of the challenged jurors must be black in order for the court to conclude a prima facie case has been made out.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State of Louisiana v. Lee Turner, Jr. · 822 So. 2d 121 - State v. Rodriguez

2. “The defendant may offer any facts relevant to the question of the prosecutor’s discriminatory intent to satisfy this burden. Such facts include, but are not limited to, a pattern of strikes by a prosecutor against members of a suspect class, statements or actions of the prosecutor which support an inference that the exercise of peremptory strikes was motivated by impermissible considerations, the composition of the venire and of the jury | ^finally empaneled, and any other disparate impact upon the suspect class which is alleged to be the victim of purposeful discrimination.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 121 So. 3d 1207 - State v. Davis

3. “My problem with this is you guys wait until we’ve released these people and they’re gone and then you put me on notice and obligates me to have some — if you make some kind of showing and I’ve got to have a hearing, and the people are gone. If you’re going to do this, you’ve got to put the Court on notice timely. [[Image here]] [I]f they did show a pattern, they have waited until these people have all been released and gone before they even notify me. If they showed a pattern what could I do?”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 94 So. 3d 983 - State v. Wilkins