Makeig v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2014
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc. · Brown v. United States · Armadillo Bail Bonds v. State · Balboa v. State · Armadillo Bail Bonds v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(d) Anytime between forfeiture and After the expiration of the time limits set by Subsection (c) of this article and befefethe entry of a final judgment against the bond.... (e) No change.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Lyles v. State · Makeig v. State“[generally, sufficient cause to set aside a forfeiture is a showing that the party did not break his or her recognizance intentionally, with the design of evading justice, or without a sufficient cause or reasonable excuse, such as unavoidable accident or inevitable necessity preventing his or her appearance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Flores“by their terms, subsections (d) and (e) were not applicable to the present circumstance, and the court's actions cannot be judged by their provisions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lyles v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.