Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 802 S.W.2d 678 - Tennard v. State

Tennard v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

97
cited by 97 later decisions
2
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 91 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 97 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably Rousseau v. State (1993), Cantu v. State (1992)

5 federal appellate · 91 state decisions

710199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Tompkins v. Texas · Whitsey v. State · Keeton v. State · Gardner v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the defendant raises an inference of purposeful discrimination through the State’s use of its peremptory strikes, and the trial court determines that a prima facie case of discrimination exists, then the burden shifts to the prosecutor who must come forward with a neutral explanation for the challenges. The trial court must then determine whether despite the State’s explanation, the defendant has established purposeful discrimination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “1. that he is a member of a cognizable racial group; 2. that the prosecutor has exercised peremptory challenges to remove members of the defendant’s race from the venire; and 3. that these facts and any other relevant circumstances raise an inference that the prosecutor used peremptory challenges to exclude the veniremembers on account of their race.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The existence and results of a polygraph examination are inadmissible for all purposes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.